|
Piling
System I
By
Dr. Heng Li [bshengli@polyu.edu.hk] Tel: 2766 5879
1.
References
R.
Chudley, Construction Technology, Volume 1 to 4,
2nd Edition, Longman
2.
Learning Objectives
Students
should master the following issues after the lectures,
-
Choice
factors for selecting different piling systems.
-
Bored
piles
-
Caissons
-
H-piles
-
Limitations
of each systems.
The
material will be covered by two lectures. The first lecture covers
the following:
The
choice factors
Bored
Piles
Caissons
(Part 1)
Emphasis
of the study should be given on the choices factors, the limitations
of each system, and the applicable situations of each piling system.
3.
The Choice Factors
3.1
Reasons for Piling
-
Where
concentration of loading occurs, it is best dealt with by
piling because it is most economical to transfer a load
directly from the point of application to the bearing stratum.
-
When
uplift to building may occur, friction piles may be used
to overcome the uplifting force.
-
When
the loading is so high that other foundation methods would
not be appropriate. Piles supported on rock create the greatest
bearing capacity.
- When
the ground floor slab has to be carried above the ground,
e.g. on a sloping site.
3.2
Factors Affecting Choice of Piles
4. Statutory
& Q.C. for Piles
In Hong
Kong, in-situ replacement piles have come into increasing use
in recent years for stability of foundations. To prevent possible
pile failures, statutory and quality control become necessary.
4.1
Statutory Control (HK)
The
statutory control of all piling work in Hong Kong is laid down
clearly in the Building (Construction) Regulations 1995,
Chapter 123, Section B, Clause 35.
In
general, the foundation of a building should safely sustain and
transmit to the ground all dead load, wind load and imposed load
of the building without impair the stability of the building and
any adjoining buildings.
Clause
38 particularly concerned with caissons which include
bored piles exceeding 900mm in diameter. The one that we should
pay particular attention is clause 38(5) which states
that "where any doubt exists as to the capacity of any caisson
to sustain, adequately and without undue settlement, the load
for which it has been designed the caisson shall be tested:-
-
By
means of core drilling of the completed in-situ concrete.
-
By
any other method to the satisfaction of the Building Authority,
in which case, the Building Authority shall determine the
standard of acceptance to be adopted.
4.2
Pile Testing
The
main objective of forming a test pile is to confirm that the design
and formation f the chosen pile type is adequate.
4.2.1
Coring Test
This
test is used to check the strength of the concrete and the intersection
between the caisson base and the rock stratum. It can be used
to detect various defects occurring in concrete, e.g. honeycombing,
segregation, voids, cracks, etc.
4.2.2
Loading Test
A
loading test is made usually for one or other of the following
reasons:
-
To
determine the load-settlement relationship, particularly
in the region of the anticipated working load.
-
To
serve as a proof test to ensure that failure does not
occur before a load is reached which is a selected multiple
of the chosen working load.
-
To
determine the real ultimate bearing capacity as a check
on the value calculated from dynamic or static formulae,
or to obtain information that will enable other piles
to be designed by empirical methods.
4.2.3
Integrity Tests
They
are used to check the soundness of the caisson shaft and the quality
of the concrete. They are generally very rapid, cause minimal
disruption to the site and are relatively inexpensive so that
large numbers of piles on a site can be economically examined.
There are two main groups of tests: Sonic Test and Vibration Test.
Sonic
Test
It is
based on measuring the propagation time of a sonic signal
between two vertical tubes cast into the pile during construction.
Vibration
Test
In
this test, an electro-dynamic vibrator is placed on the head
of the caisson, applying a constant sinusoidal force of 50N
within the range 20-5000 Hz. The head of the pile simple moves
up and down as the frequency as the vibrator where the velocity
of this movement is measured by the transducer for analysis.
Bored
Piles
There
are various methods of installing bored piles. Two methods of
providing this are:-
by
using a steel casing, for example, with small diameter bored
piles; and
by
using drilling mud (bentonite) to support the excavation, for
example, with large diameter bored piles.
5.1
Small Diameter Bored Piles with Temporary Casing
Small diameter
bored in-situ pile range in diameter from 300 to 950 mm and
is designed to carry loads of up to 1500 KN.
Crane
mounted or lorry mounted rotary drilling rigs or a percussion
boring tool is used to excavate these piles. The stages of installation
using a tripod or shear leg percussion boring tool are described
below.
Stage
1
The percussion tool, consisting of the tripod or shear leg, a
winch and the cutter, are set up. A starter hole is then made
by dropping the cutter from the raised position.
Stage
2
The first section of casing, which has a cutting edge, is placed
in the starter hole. This section of casing is known as the cutter
casing. The casing, which varies in length from 1 to 1.4m, can
be extended by screwing on additional lengths.
Stage
3
Additional lengths of casing are screwed on to the cutter casing.
A driving cap is placed on top of the casing, and the casing is
driven ahead of boring. The casing is driven by using the weighted
head of the percussion tool which acts as a drop hammer.
Stage
4
Soil is bored out from within the casing by means of the percussion
tool cutter.
Stage
5
Stages 3 and 4 are repeated and the boring and casing extended
to the required depth.
Stage
6
A steel reinforcement cage is placed in the borehole and a high
slump concrete is then placed into the temporary casing. The concrete
should be placed by means of a tremie pipe or by trunking.
Stage
7
The temporary casing is extracted when concreting is completed.
This
type of pile with temporary support can be very long, and the
length can be varied to suit different site conditions. The pile
can be constructed in restricted headroom, or confined sites,
and within centimetres of existing structures and old sewers without
damaging their stability.
The
problems associated with small diameter piles are the limitations
in the diameter of the pile (maximum diameter 600mm), the difficulty
of positioning the reinforcement cage correctly, and the possibility
of causing settlement to adjacent structures.

5.2
Large Diameter Bored Piles Supported by Bentonite
Large
diameter bored in situ piles range in diameter from 1000 to 3600mm,
and are designed to carry loads of up to 30,000KN.
Truck
or crane mounted rotary drilling rigs or grab rigs with or without
casing oscillators are used to excavate these piles.
The
four stages in the installation of these piles using a crane mounted
rotary drilling rig are described below.
Stage
1
A short length of casing is pitched in the required position.
Excavation is carried out within the casing by means of a helical
auger (or grab), and the casing is then inserted into the ground.
This short length of casing prevents surface water and debris
from entering the borehole. It also prevents the collapse of the
loose surface soil at the mouth of the borehole, and the loss
of the bentonite through the loose surface soil.
Stage
2
The borehole is filled with bentonite suspension from storage
tanks. When mixed with the correct amount of water, bentonite
exhibits thixotropic properties. Boring proceeds through the bentonite,
which is fed continuously into the hole during boring.
Stage
3
Boring stops when the desired depth is reached. The auger is then
withdrawn. A reinforcement cage is lowered through the bentonite
and concrete is placed through a tremie pipe. The bentonite, which
is displaced by the concrete, is pumped back into storage tanks.
The bentonite can be strained to remove soil particles, and then
re-used.
Stage
4
On completion of the concreting, the tremie pipe is removed and
the short casing is withdrawn. Large diameter bored piles, the
maximum diameter of which can be 3.6m, the pile length can be
varied to suit site conditions, and piles can be as long as 60m.
However,
care must be taken to ensure that the reinforcement cage is correctly
positioned to provide adequate cover to all the reinforcement.
5.3
Equipment for Installing Bored Piles
Rotary
Drilling Rigs and Augers
The drilling
rig may be mounted on a mobile crane, or a truck. The drilling
rig consists of an auger, mounted on a telescopic or extendable
kelly bar. The kelly bar is a square hollow steel shaft which
is generally about 7.5m long, but can be extended if required.
Crane
and Grab Rigs and Casing Oscillator
Grabs consist of clamshell buckets which are opened and closed
by means of wire ropes, or hydraulically. They are suspended
from mobile cranes.
The grab
is dropped on to the soil in an open position and is then closed.
It is then raised to the surface and emptied at the side of
the shaft.
The temporary
casing is driven into the soil by means of an oscillator, which
is hydraulically powered. The oscillator clamps itself to the
casing and, by a combination of rotating and pushing, forces
the casing into the ground. The oscillator is also used to withdraw
the casing on completion of the concreting of pile.
|
Topic
|
Pile
Type
|
|
Small
Diameter Bored Piles
|
Large
Diameter Bored Piles
|
|
Noise
Pollution
|
Very
little
|
Very
little
|
|
Possibility
of installing in restricted headroom
|
Yes,
possible
|
No,
not possible
|
|
Possibility
of ground heave
|
No
risk
|
No
risk
|
|
Possibility
of ‘necking’ or ‘waisting’
|
May
occur
|
"Necking’
or ‘waisting’ may occur
|
|
Possibility
of forming a large diameter pile
|
Not
applicable
|
Yes,
up to 3.6m
|
|
Ease
of quality control of the pile
|
No,
difficult to control
|
No,
difficult to control
|
|
Special
equipment required
|
No
special equipment required
|
No
special equipment required
|
|
Possibility
of varying the pile length on site
|
Yes,
possible
|
Yes,
possible
|
6. Hand-Dug
Caissons
In
Hong Kong, ‘Hand-dug caisson’ is a term generally used for what
other would called a ‘Hand-dug pile’. A hand-dug caisson is a
cylindrical shaft formed in the ground, with openings at both
top and bottom. The shaft is excavated in stages by hand and the
wall of the shaft is lined with 75 to 100mm thick in-situ concrete
as excavation progresses. If the water table is high, the thickness
of lining may be increased to 150 or 200mm at depths of 30m.
In
Hong Kong, hand-dug caissons are often used instead of large diameter
cast-in-situ piles. The diameter of the caisson ranges from 800
to 3000mm. It is common practice to excavate the shaft to a depth
of 45m. This may include 20m or more, below the water table.
6.1
Why Hand-dug Caisson is Popular in Hong Kong
Various
Soil Conditions
The geological conditions in Hong Kong varies drastically from
sloped granolithic sites near the foot of the Victoria Mountain
in Hong Kong Island to some of the sandy-silt areas in Yuen
Long. Hand-dug caisson construction is more flexible and it
can adjust the method of excavation easily from simply hand-digging
for soils to rock drilling.
Comparative
Low Plant or Equipment Cost
Both bore piling construction and pre-cast pile driven construction
will require the use of heavy machines. However, Hand-dug caisson
construction requires only simple equipment. Thus the plant
cost for this particular construction method is comparatively
low.
Availability
of Manual Labour
For each caisson, two workers are usually required. One on the
ground level receiving the steel bucket for discharge while
the other is working inside the caisson. The cost of caisson
is the cheapest among all types of foundation.
Construction
Period
The time required to complete the excavation by the use of boring
machine is very much dictated by the efficiency as well as the
number of the machines available.
The four
aspects of caisson foundations which must be considered are:
Design, Acceptance, Performance and Construction Safety.
Design In
designing a caisson, generally, there are two main points needed
to be considered. Firstly, the size and depth of the caisson
so that the expected loads will not cause settlement. Secondly,
the economy of caisson construction in different situations.
Acceptance Acceptance
of a caisson is a type of quality assurance using testing methods
and it is to determine whether or not the caisson has been constructed
according with the design assumptions.
Performance
The performance
of a caisson in service is its settlement behavior during and
after the application of construction and service loads.
Construction
Safety
The main draw back of the use of hand-dug caisson is construction
safety. During the year 80-86, there are 27 fatal accidents
where 30 workers were killed and 85 non-fatal accidents where
97 workers injured. The causes of the accidents are:-
fall
of person
falling
object
electrocution
gassing
in
rush of mud or water
The
Building Regulation (Construction) and The Construction Site (Safety)
Regulation have laid down some requirements which are related
to caisson.
6.3
Equipment for Forming Hand-Dug Caissons
The
equipment commonly used in forming hand-dug caissons are:-
-
A
pair of timber frames supporting a steel runway beam above
the caisson.
-
A
steel drum skip to allow tilting for discharge.
-
A
hoisting system consisting of an electrically operated chain
block.
-
An
electric fan-blower which supplies air directly to the bottom
of the caisson.
-
An
electric water pump for pumping out any ground water.
-
Hand
and/or pneumatic tools for excavation work.
-
A
tapered steel formwork, for the concrete lining to the caisson.
Safety
equipment would also include spare parts for the fan-blower, a
first aid kit and equipment to administer oxygen.
|